The court returned to that idea five years ago when it was confronted with the case of a Christian baker who objected to designing a cake for a same-sex wedding. The belief that marriage can only be between one man and one woman is an idea that "long has been held - and continues to be held - in good faith by reasonable and sincere people here and throughout the world," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the court's gay marriage decision. That civil rights law decision was also written by Gorsuch.Įven as it has expanded gay rights, however, the court has been careful to say those with differing religious views needed to be respected. For two decades, the court has expanded the rights of LGBTQ people, most notably giving same-sex couples the right to marry in 2015 and announcing five years later that a landmark civil rights law also protects gay, lesbian and transgender people from employment discrimination. The decision is also a retreat on gay rights for the court. Last year, for example, the court ruled along ideological lines for a football coach who prayed on the field at his public high school after games. The decision is a win for religious rights and one in a series of cases in recent years in which the justices have sided with religious plaintiffs. "Today, the Court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class," Sotomayor wrote. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissent that was joined by the court's other liberals. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the court's six conservative justices that the First Amendment "envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands." "Disagreement isn't discrimination, and the government can't mislabel speech as discrimination to censor it," she said in a statement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |